Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael C Bann's avatar

Peter, Good stuff! In my space of direct response marketing I have seen some pushback regarding AI. It's funny how people lament about both the amount and relevance of ads they receive. Data Scientists are now leveraging AI to find "in-market" prospects. They do this thru both online and offline data. They are looking for patterns of activity and purchases preceding an ultimate purchase across as wide a swath of past customers as possible. The end goal is to make ads relevant as these prospects have literally raised their hands with interest in a given product or service. While the amount of ads might not go down their relevance increases. Which I would argue is a win for the consumer.

Expand full comment
Dr. Donna Murdoch's avatar

The list goes on. One I would like to build on - education. Inclination by schools - shut it down. Fear. What will we do. Students at all levels will cheat. What I’ve found, albeit w master and doctoral students, is use that flexes a different and perhaps more important muscle. Critical thinking. Read the output. Is it correct? What is wrong, what needs to be added, what is right, “oh I never thought of that” are all a part of utilizing the output. Maybe a little extra effort if fearful (teachers or Professors) do not ask for papers. Other ways to demonstrate cognition. Much more to say about the other categories but since I teach this in Adult Ed, this is my approach. Encourage its use. Use it well. And, for now, ICs and managers have the advantage while the big corporate machines figure out new “strategies” which may (will) be obsolete by the time there is ideation, agreement, and consensus. Thanks!

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts